Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Ritz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1967No. 38687PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Langenbach, J. †

— The defendants have appealed from a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff insurance com pany. The only issue is whether a full and final general release of all claims included a release of claims for medical expenses where a plea to the contrary raised no suggestion of fraud, overreaching, questionable conduct, misrepresentation, incapacity or mutual mistake.

There is no question of fact. Under these circumstances the release of all claims included all claims as a matter of law. Pepper v. Evanson, ante p. 309, 422 P.2d 817 (1967); Beaver v. Estate of Harris, 67 Wn.2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beaver v. Estate of HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Pepper v. EvansonWashington Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Burgess v. Premier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Thiringer v. American Motors InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API