Legal Opinion

Propeck v. Farmers' Mut. Ins. Ass'n of Grayson County

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 1933No. 11307PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOONEY, Justice.

In its second motion for rehearing, appel-lee contended that, to the extent of the damages 'collected by appellant from the Missouri-Kansas & Texas Railroad Company, whose alleged negligence caused the destruction of the insured property, appellee would be entitled to relief from liability on the judgment in favor of appellant.

Neither the issue of subrogation nor .the right to an offset was pleaded in the court below, the matter being called to our attention for the first time in appellee’s second motion for rehearing. However, appellant had seemingly recognized appellee’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Washtenaw Mutual Fire Insurance v. BuddMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Thiringer v. American Motors InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ortiz v. Great Southern Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Wimberly v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Weber v. United Hardware & Implement Mutuals Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API