Martin v. Midwestern Group Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
The issue before us is whether the “other owned vehicle” exclusion in the uninsured motorist coverage of appellant’s automobile insurance policy is enforceable. For the following reasons, we hold that the exclusion is not enforceable. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
The General Assembly has determined that automobile liability carriers must offer uninsured motorist coverage to their customers. R.C. 3937.18 provides in part:
*480“(A) No automobile liability or motor vehicle liability policy of insurance insuring against loss resulting from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- Curran v. State Automobile Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
- State Farm Automobile Insurance v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Hedrick v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Stanton v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Ross v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- Moore v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Lager v. Miller-GonzalezOhio Supreme Court · 2008
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.