Darst v. Meduna
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
As assignee of Metal Bonding, Inc., plaintiff brought this action to recover the balance due under a conditional sales contract between his assignor and defendant John F. Meduna. The defendants set up an affirmative defense of fraud, alleging damages on that account in excess of the balance due on the contract. The court specifically found that there was no fraud perpetrated by plaintiff’s assignor. It found that the defendants were in default for payments due under the contract in the amount of $467.84, and entered judgment accordingly. Defendants appeal.
We shall not discuss the evidence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taplin & Rowell v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
- State ex rel. Davis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Washington, Alexandria, & Georgetown Steam Packet Co. v. SicklesSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- da Ponte v. SimonianWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Banks v. CrowOregon Supreme Court · 1869
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bariel v. TuinstraWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- W. L. Reid Co. v. M-B Contracting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
- Mell v. WinslowWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Wilkinson v. SampleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983