Legal Opinion

Czarnikow-Rionda Co. v. West Market Grocery Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 1, 1927No. 364PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge

(after stating the. facts as above). The main question presented on this writ of error raises an interesting point of law, but before reaching it the sufficiency of the evidence to prove one essential fact must be considered. The defendant contends that the plaintiff entirely failed to prove that the sugar of which it complains was defective in quality when loaded on the . cars at the refinery. The question is properly raised on this record, under the doctrine recently stated in Thompson-Starrett Co. v. La Belle Iron Works, 17 F.(2d) 536 (C. C. A. 2).

We are satisfied, however, that the proof…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Young & Conant Manufacturing Co. v. WakefieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Portfolio v. . RubinNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Mansfield v. TriggMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Thompson-Starrett Co. v. La Belle Iron WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Marshall's GarageCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. Adams-Mitchell Co. v. Cambridge Distributing Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Frankel v. Foreman & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  4. First Nationwide Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Conoco Oil Co. v. Union Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API