Legal Opinion
Handy v. Brownlee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 22, 2004No. 04-50545UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Appellant James D. Handy, a civilian employee at an Army installation, was injured in an accident. After the accident, he was able to return to work, subject to certain accommodations. Handy’s physical restrictions eventually became so severe that even with all reasonable accommodations, he could no longer fulfill the core responsibilities of his job. Handy thus chose to take disability retirement. He then filed suit against the Secretary of the Army in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, claiming that he was discharged in violation of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pennsylvania State Police v. SudersSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Lyle S. Chandler and Adolphus A. Maddox, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. The City of Dallas, the City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Kenneth C. Antol v. William J. Perry, Secretary Department of Defense, (Defense Logistics Agency)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Duncan v. University of Texas Health Science CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Williamson v. American National Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Kurth v. GonzalesDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2007
- Kurth v. GonzalesDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2006