Legal Opinion
Kurth v. Gonzales
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided January 3, 2007No. 1:05-cv-00472PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HINES, United States Magistrate Judge.
In an earlier memorandum opinion, the court partially addressed defendant’s motion to dismiss. See Docket No. 64. That opinion (referred to for convenience as Kurth I) considered asserted defenses that were appropriately analyzed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12. 1 This second opinion now addresses that part of defendant’s motion properly examined as a motion for summary judgment under principles pertinent to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Specifically, this opinion considers and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Howe v. YellowbookDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
- Smith v. BunkleySuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
- Andrassy v. Jan X-Ray Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2025
- Milteer v. Navarro County TexasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
- Sallie Walker v. Jackson Parish Correctional CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2026