Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Housley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 2005No. 02-3108; A122691PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

In this dissolution of marriage proceeding, husband appeals an order granting wife’s motion to set aside the judgment of dissolution, which was entered after wife failed to appear for trial. The trial court, in setting aside the judgment pursuant to ORCP 71 B(l)(a), found “excusable neglect” on wife’s part.

Wife has moved to dismiss the appeal, asserting that the trial court’s order is not an appealable order. We initially denied the motion, but we now reconsider our earlier ruling and conclude that the trial court’s order is not appealable under ORS 19.205 (2001), amended by Or Laws 2003, ch…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carter v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. OlsenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Milton J. Wershow Co. v. McVeety MacHinery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Cooley v. RomanOregon Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ballard v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Mary Ebel Johnson, P.C. v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Bhattacharyya v. City of TigardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API