Legal Opinion

Pacheco v. Blatchford

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 1, 1988No. 86 1450; CA A43920PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant 1 appeals the denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment, arguing that his failure to appear in the action was due to excusable neglect. ORCP 71B. We affirm.

In June, 1986, plaintiffs attorney wrote to defendant, asserting a claim for damages arising out of an allegedly negligent root canal surgery performed by defendant. Defendant forwarded the letter to his insurance agent, who sent the letter to the insurance carrier. The carrier then contacted plaintiffs attorney. Following further communication, plaintiffs attorney sent a letter to the carrier in August, stating that,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lowe v. Institutional Investors TrustOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hackett v. Alco Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Reitz v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. OF EUGENECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ballard v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. In re the Marriage of WeaverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. In re the Marriage of OwensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Burt & Gordon v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Van Dyke v. Varsity Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API