Legal Opinion

Ira Coleman Roberts, Billy O'Niel Hughes v. The United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 25, 1955No. 12411PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, Ira Coleman Roberts and Billy O’Niel Hughes, were indicted for use of an interstate telephone call for the purpose of executing a scheme to defraud, in violation of Section 1343, Title 18, U. S. Code. Following trial by jury and a verdict of guilty, they received sentences of five years and three years respectively, from which these appeals were taken.

Section 1343, Title 18, U.S.Code, enacted July 16, 1952, provides as follows:

“Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Fox v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Fox v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. George Harold Wiltsey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph Indelicato, United States of America v. Richard F. NutileCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. VastolaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
  3. Hardin v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Eva v. Midwest National Mortgage Banc, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
  5. State v. GravenOhio Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API