Legal Opinion

United States v. Vastola

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 1, 1987No. Crim. A. 86-301(SSB)PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION

II. MOTIONS TO DISMISS, TO STRIKE AND TO FORCE THE GOVERNMENT TO ELECT BETWEEN CHARGED OFFENSES AND COUNTS

A. Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss Counts 1 and 3; or in the Alternative to Dismiss Acts 1, 17, 18, and Count 1, 1Í 5 Because Multiple Conspiracies are Plead as Predicate Acts

B. Defendants’ Joint Motion to Compel the Government to Elect Between the Two Substantive RICO Counts (1 and 2)

II. MOTIONS TO DISMISS, TO STRIKE AND TO FORCE THE GOVERNMENT TO ELECT BETWEEN CHARGED OFFENSES AND COUNTS— Continued

C. Defendants’ Joint Motion to Strike Surplusage from…

2Cases cited137 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. Aubrey JoshuaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. United States of America, at Nos. 89-5372/5383, at No. 89-5510 v. Gaetano Vastola, at No. 89-5372, at No. 89-5510 v. Elias Saka, at No. 89-5383Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Gaetano Vastola, United States of America v. Elias Saka, A/K/A "Lew,"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. United States of America, in No. 89-5510 v. Gaetano Vastola, in No. 89-5372 v. Elias Saka, in No. 89-5383Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. EisenbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API