Legal Opinion
Fox v. Washington
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 23, 1915No. 134PublishedCited by 189 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
236 U.S. 273 (1915)
FOX
v.
STATE OF WASHINGTON.
No. 134.
Supreme Court of United States.
Submitted January 19, 1915.
Decided February 23, 1915.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON.
Mr. Gilbert E. Roe for plaintiff in error.
Mr. W.V. Tanner, Attorney General of the State of Washington, and Mr. Fred G. Remann, for defendant in error.
2Opinion of the Court · HolmesJustice Holmes
This is an information for editing printed matter tending to encourage and advocate disrespect for law contrary to a statute of Washington. The statute is as follows: "Every person who shall wilfully print, publish, edit, issue, or knowingly circulate, sell,…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 1)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Fox v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
4Cited by189 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.