Legal Opinion

Helms v. Bell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1900No. 18,857PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court-.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

— Appellant Helms» and eleven others filed a petition before the board of commissioners of Hamilton county for the location of a highway over the lands of appellees. Viewers were appointed who reported in favor of the utility of the road; whereupon, appellees filed a remonstrance claiming damages, and also denying the public utility of the way. Reviewers were appointed who made their report finding the road to be of public utility, and assessing damages in favor of each of the appellees, which report of the reviewers was approved by the commissioners, who, thereupon caused a record of said…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Doctor v. HartmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. City of Terre Haute v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Gold v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailwayIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Adams v. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. City of Bluffton v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Larimer v. KrauIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Eads v. KumleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Lee v. McClellandIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API