Legal Opinion

State v. Delgado

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 11, 2009No. AC 29540PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendant, Luis E. Delgado, appearing pro se, appeals following the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Specifically, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) found that his sentence for possession of a weapon in a motor vehicle in violation of General Statutes § 29-38 was legal with regard to the manner in which the weapon was used and (2) found that his sentence was within the parameters of § 29-38 with regard to the size of the weapon used. We conclude that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the motion. Accordingly, we reverse the…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. State v. CatorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. State v. MolloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. State v. FowlkesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. State v. MeikleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. State v. BresciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. State v. DaytonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  5. State v. CruzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API