Legal Opinion

State v. Brescia

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 20, 2010No. AC 30855PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

In this case, the state, concededly in error, prosecuted the defendant, Mark A. Brescia, for conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 53a-138, even though the evidence on which it relied at the defendant’s plea hearing did not support that charge. Rather, the evidence supported only a charge of conspiracy to commit forgery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 53a-139. Nevertheless, the defendant pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree and thereafter was sentenced accordingly.

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. State v. MolloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  2. State v. RoblesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. State v. BryanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API