Blumenthal v. Goodall
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This cause has been heard in Department and in Bank, and is now before the court in Bank for decision upon an order granting a rehearing.
This is an action for the recovery of commissions claimed to have been earned by a real estate agent in the sale of certain lands belonging to defendant. Judg-J ment for defendant; motion for new trial denied; and] appeal from both judgment and order.
The court found that the defendant, being the owner of the land in question, on the thirteenth day of July, 1887, gave to L. Oesterreicher, a real estate agent, an authorization in writing, of which the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hawley v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Lane v. AlbrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Alemany v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Hancock v. StacyTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- Elevator Operators & Starters' Union v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Houston v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.