Legal Opinion

Klorman v. Westcliff Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 3, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ackeeson, S. C. C.

This action is upon a bond to recover a deficiency resulting from the foreclosure of the accompanying mortgage, and the matter now comes before me upon plaintiff’s motion to strike out the separate answer of the defendant Westcliff Company, Incorporated, and the joint answer of the defendants Henrietta Schneider and John J. Schneider upon the grounds that said answers and the defenses contained therein and the objections in point of law raised thereby are sham or frivolous.

The decision of this motion hinges upon the sufficiency of the first separate defense contained in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vanderbilt v. Brunton Piano Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. Usbe Bldg. v. Ocean Pier RealtyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  3. Commercial Funding Corp. v. Melroy Const. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  4. Hunt v. GorenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  5. Barnaby v. Bradley & Currier Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. RIVER EDGE S. & L. ASS'N v. Clubhouse AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  2. Wootton v. PollockNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  3. Hackensack Trust Co. v. VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API