Legal Opinion

Wootton v. Pollock

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 19, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill in this cause is filed for the purpose of securing a deficiency decree against the devisees and legatees of the original mortgagor and against the grantee of the original mortgagor, said grantee having assumed and agreed to pay the original debt.

The bill in this cause is admittedly filed within six months of the sale of the mortgaged premises under foreclosure, but not within three months from said date, as provided in P.L. 1933ch. 82 p. 172.

The legatees of the original mortgagor and obligor have moved to strike the bill of complaint on the ground, inter alia, that the bill was not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Bronson v. KinzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  4. Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Hawkins v. Barney's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1831

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. N.J. Title Guarantee Trust Co. v. BerlinerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  2. Meyer v. SupinskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  3. Union County Building & Loan Ass'n v. WeltchekCourt of Common Pleas of New Jersey · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API