Legal Opinion

Columbia Bank v. Morgan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

It is conceded that the amount owing by Markgraf to the defendant was paid out of the assets of the bank; that the check delivered by Markgraf to the defendant was not deposited in the bank, and that the amount thereof was not charged to his account. The actual transaction that took place at the bank on the 31st day of March, 1924, did not appear upon the records of the bank. When the examination of the bank’s books was made in September, 1924, it was discovered that Markgraf had embezzled funds of the bank prior to defendant’s loan to him, and that he had also been guilty of embezzlement of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hier v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Grady v. Pink Hill Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Pope v. Ramsey County State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Williams v. DorrierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Home Savings Bank v. GertenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hawkins Realty Co. v. Hawkins State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Fine v. Harney County National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Schwenker v. ParryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Haynes v. Lincoln Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API