Legal Opinion

Williams v. Dorrier

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1890No. 32PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL BY DEPENDANT PROM THE COURT OP COMMON PLEAS OP BEDFORD COUNTY. No. 32 July Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 228 April Term 1886, G. P. . On March 8, 1886, J. B. Williams, receiver of the Bedford County Bank, brought foreign attachment; in debt against William'Dorrier. The defendant appeared; issue.

Read the full summary

APPEAL BY DEPENDANT PROM THE COURT OP COMMON PLEAS OP BEDFORD COUNTY. No. 32 July Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 228 April Term 1886, G. P. . On March 8, 1886, J. B. Williams, receiver of the Bedford County Bank, brought foreign attachment; in debt against William'Dorrier. The defendant appeared; issue. At the trial on April 26, 1888, it was made to appear that the plaintiff bank was a partnership, having under its articles of association a president, directors, and a cashier who was also a partner. The cashier was one John DuBois. William Dorrier, residing at Scottsville, Va., had a…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam:

There is nothing in this record that requires a reversal of the judgment. Neither of the specifications of error is sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Home Savings Bank v. GertenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Fine v. Harney County National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Columbia Bank v. MorganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Schwenker v. ParryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Fine v. Harney County National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API