Legal Opinion

Millfield Realty Co. v. Catena

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cardozo, Ch. J.

A house and lot in Brooklyn, belonging to the defendant Eugene P. Catena, was sold to the plaintiff at public auction by Joseph P. Day, Inc., auctioneer. The terms of sale, signed by the owner described the width of the plot as 30.7§ feet in front and 18.1 feet in the rear. A circular distributed at the sale described the building as a four-story and basement-brick apartment having two apartments of two rooms and bath on each floor. The buyer at the time of the sale made payment to the auctioneer of a fee of $30 and also $3,525, ten per cent of the bid.

At the time set for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Margraf v. . MuirNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Cockcroft v. . MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Hammer v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Merritt v. ArcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  5. Gelman v. Joseph P. Day, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Itoh v. Kimi Sales, Ltd.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  2. Millfield Realty Co. v. CatenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API