Legal Opinion

Gelman v. Joseph P. Day, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. The defendant corporation, the auctioneer, was a stakeholder of the amount deposited. (See Merritt v. Archer, 163 App. Div. 648.) That it was regarded as a stakeholder by its officers and agents is apparent from the circumstances. When, after the sale, plaintiff went to its office he was informed that he should make the cheek payable to defendant. In reply to his *608question he was informed that defendant was responsible for the amount until plaintiff received the deed. The printed receipt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cockcroft v. . MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Merritt v. ArcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gelman v. Joseph P. Day, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Millfield Realty Co. v. CatenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API