Legal Opinion
Hammer v. Michael
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 16, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
The defendant on the sixth day of October, 1924, contracted to buy the premises owned by the plaintiff, known as 142 Hooper street, Brooklyn, N. Y. The building consisted of three floors used by three separate and distinct families, and was constructed for this purpose. The trial court found and it was conceded that the property at the time the defendant saw and examined it and at the time of the contract was occupied by three families yielding $57.50 a month from the top floor apartment; $60.00 a month from the middle floor apartment, and the ground floor which was then occupied' by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McClure v. . LeaycraftNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Margraf v. . MuirNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Anderson v. Steinway & SonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Matter of Superintendent of BanksNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Anderson v. . Steinway SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Da Silva v. MussoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bregman v. MeehanNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Morrow v. Renniere Process, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Hutt v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Schwartz v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.