Legal Opinion

Millfield Realty Co. v. Catena

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cardozo, Ch. J.

The plaintiff, the successful bidder at an auction sale, brought this action against Joseph P. Day, Inc., the auctioneer, and Eugene Catena and wife, the owners, to recover the down payment and expenses.

The trial judge dismissed the complaint, and incorporated in his judgment a direction that the auctioneer be permitted to retain its commissions ($881.25) and expenses ($134), and that it turn over to the sellers $2,534.75, the amount of the deposit after making; these deductions.

The plaintiff appealed from that judgment to the Appellate Division. The auctioneer did not appeal,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Langley v. . WarnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Marlee, Inc. v. BittarNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. LeGros v. Chain Shirt Shops, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. Millfield Realty Co. v. CatenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Bedford AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  2. Lowenstein v. ReikesNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Abrahami v. UPC Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Bower v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Rector, Churchwardens & Vestrymen of the Church of the Holy Trinity v. Manufacturers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API