Legal Opinion

Buckeye Saw Manufacturing Co. v. Rutherford

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1909PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Webster County. Action by the Buckeye Saw Manufacturing Company against A. J. Rutherford. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, Judge:

On the 20th of October, 1903, A. J. Rutherford bought of The Buckeye Manufacturing Company, through its traveling agent, E. E. Simons, and its local agent, A. B. Elbon who resided *396at Webster Springs, West Virginia, one 58 inch, inserted tooth, circular saw. This purchase was made upon a printed order blank which contained the following provision: “Saw is to be made of best quality of steel, free from flaws and practically true. Should it prove defective in any particular during time of trial, you are then to put in good shape, or if necessary, replace it with a new saw.and it…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Henry v. SneedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Newlin v. BeardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Coles v. Jefferson Ins. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Dewing v. HuttonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. First National Bank v. Charles Nelson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1868

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jenkins Bros. Shoe Co. v. G. v. Renfrow & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Black & White Cab Co. v. New York Indemnity Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Jarvis v. Pennsylvania Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Great Eastern Refining Corp. v. ShankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Cottrill v. First Huntington National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API