Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Traverso v. Department of Transportation

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 2001No. A087456PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAY, J.

Richard Traverso doing business as Adco Outdoor Advertising appeals from an order dismissing his first amended petition for writ of mandate and complaint for damages (the complaint) against the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) after Caltrans’s demurrer was sustained without leave to amend, This suit unsuccessfully attempts to revive permits for billboards which were canceled over a quarter-century ago. The dismissal is affirmed.

I. Background

The permits in question are for four billboards along U.S. Highway 101 in San Mateo County. The prior owners of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Avenida San Juan Partnership v. City of San ClementeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Travis v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Regents of the University of Calif. v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  4. The Regents of the U. of Cal. v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. Travis v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API