Legal Opinion

People v. Aparicio

California Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1952No. Crim. 5250PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The defendant was charged with the murder of Santana Acosta on April 16, 1951. Since he claimed to be unable to understand English an interpreter was appointed. The defendant pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity. He refused to engage an attorney or to have one appointed by the court to represent him. The court directed the public defender to assist him as amicus curiae. He was found guilty of first degree murder without recommendation but the jury was unable to agree as to whether he was sane at the time the crime was committed. A second jury, in proceedings presided over…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. People v. SloperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. In Re BuchananCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. McPetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. MerkourisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. LaudermilkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. Superior Court (Marks)California Supreme Court · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API