Legal Opinion

People v. West

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 4, 1914No. Crim. No. 256PublishedCited by 28 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County and from an order refusing a new trial. J. Q. White, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A rehearing in these cases was granted by this court and, upon further consideration, we have concluded that the judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted.

The defendants were convicted in the superior court of the crime of murder in the second degree and sentenced to the penitentiary for life. At the time of the homicide, November 28, 1913, they were inmates and patients at the Mendocino state hospital for the insane and deceased, at the time of his death, was also an inmate and. patient of said institution. Before the trial the defendants regularly moved the court that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marshall v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. In Re BuchananCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. People v. Ah YingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. MerkourisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. LaudermilkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. Superior Court (Marks)California Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. People v. GomezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API