Legal Opinion

Cumber v. Cumber

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1982No. Civ. 10225PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

Guillerma and Ronald Cumber were divorced by a decree of the district court of Stutsman County. A document labeled “judgment” directed that their house be placed on the market and sold. The house was to be moved upon its sale because it was located on land owned by Ronald’s father. After considering appraisals submitted by both parties, the court found that the fair market value of the house was $28,000. That finding was erroneously la beled “Conclusion of Law XII,” and was inserted verbatim in the “judgment”. The “judgment” also provided that the $28,000, or any higher…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hoge v. HogeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Eberhart v. EberhartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. French v. BrinkmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hospital Services, Inc. v. BrackeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of RakettiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Thompson v. GoetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. N.C.C. v. C.S.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Eagleman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Ceynar v. BarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API