Legal Opinion

Eagleman v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2016No. 20150145PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Matthew Eagleman appealed from district court orders summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief and his motion for new, trial. We *3reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

I

[¶2] In 2002, Eagleman pied guilty,to gross sexual imposition and harboring a runaway. After twice violating his probation, the district court revoked Eagleman’s probation and sentenced him in, 2011. This 2011 sentence included a third probationary term. . In 2012, the State moved to correct this sentence because, under State v. Stavig, 2006 ND 63, 711 N.W.2d 183, a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Teigen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Sauby v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  4. N.C.C. v. C.S.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. CauserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Grasser v. GrasserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Rogers v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Chisholm v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Estate of FroemkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Frith v. The Park District of the City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API