Eagleman v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Matthew Eagleman appealed from district court orders summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief and his motion for new, trial. We *3reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.
I
[¶2] In 2002, Eagleman pied guilty,to gross sexual imposition and harboring a runaway. After twice violating his probation, the district court revoked Eagleman’s probation and sentenced him in, 2011. This 2011 sentence included a third probationary term. . In 2012, the State moved to correct this sentence because, under State v. Stavig, 2006 ND 63, 711 N.W.2d 183, a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Teigen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Sauby v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- N.C.C. v. C.S.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. CauserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grasser v. GrasserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Rogers v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Chisholm v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Estate of FroemkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Frith v. The Park District of the City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.