Legal Opinion

Ceynar v. Barth

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 2017No. 20170135PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEvers, Justice.

[¶ 1] David and Virginia- Ceynar appeal from a summary judgment -dismissing their breach of contract/covenant and nuisance action against Lonnie Barth and The Ridge at Hawktree Homeowners’ Association. Because the district court did not err in ruling that the Association’s restrictive covenants were not violated, and because Barth’s actions as a matter of law did not unreasonably interfere with the Ceynars’ use and enjoyment of their property, we affirm..

I

[¶ 2] The Ceynars and Barth are neighbors at The Ridge at Hawktree, a Bismarck subdivision near a golf course, and are…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Thompson v. GoetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Tibert v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Hill v. Community of Damien of MolokaiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Berger v. SellersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  2. RTS Shearing v. BNI CoalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Pennington v. Continental ResourcesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. G & D Enterprises v. LiebeltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Berger v. SellersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API