Legal Opinion
United States v. Gaskins
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided May 23, 2013No. 13-0016/ARPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge RYAN
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Contrary to his pleas, a panel composed of officer and enlisted members convicted Appellant of carnal knowledge, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 920 (2006), repealed by National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, Pub.L. No. 109-163, § 552, 119 Stat. 3136 (2006), and indecent acts with *227a child and indecent assault, both in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2006).1 At his first sentence hearing, the panel sentenced Appellant to confinement for twelve years, forfeiture of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. AkbarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. RigginsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. LovelyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.