Southern Pacific Co. v. Los Angeles Milling Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
The defendant, Los Angeles Milling Company, having threatened to destroy that portion of a certain spur-track which traversed its premises, suit for an injunction was instituted by Southern Pacific Company. Defendant answered and filed a cross-complaint by which Southern Pacific Railroad Company, the lessor of the plaintiff, Was brought in, and after issues joined upon answers to that pleading the cause was heard with the result that an injunction was granted restraining Los Angeles Milling Company from tearing up the track or obstructing the use thereof.
Prior to April 24,1878, the Southern…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Schwerdtle v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Williams v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Cheda v. BodkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Highland Realty Co. v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Nauman v. Treen Box Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Rosebrook v. UtzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Palvutzian v. TerkanianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.