Legal Opinion
State v. Fortun-Cebada
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 25, 2010No. 62679-5-IPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
241 P.3d 800 (2010)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Jorge FORTUN-CEBADA, Appellant.
No. 62679-5-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
October 25, 2010.
Christopher Gibson, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, Jordan Broome McCabe, Bellevue, WA, for Appellant.
Jennifer H.S. Atchison, King Co. Pros. Att., Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
SCHINDLER, J.
¶ 1 The State charged Jorge Fortun-Cebada with possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. Fortun-Cebada seeks reversal of his conviction of possession of cocaine, claiming his attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. Glenn T. ZamzowWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. MechamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- United States v. Amin De CastroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- In re the Personal Restraint of MinesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State of Washington v. Haven Mary ScabbyrobeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.