Legal Opinion

State v. Fortun-Cebada

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 25, 2010No. 62679-5-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

¶1 The State charged Jorge Fortun-Cebada with possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. Fortun-Cebada seeks reversal of his conviction of possession of cocaine, claiming his attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to move to suppress on the grounds that the police unlawfully seized the alleged buyer, Wilbert Walker, and Walker’s show-up identification of Fortun-Cebada was inherently unreliable. Fortun-Cebada also claims that because admission of out-of-court hearsay statements at the CrR 3.6 suppression hearing violated his constitutional right to confrontation…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. MechamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. United States v. Amin De CastroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of MinesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. State of Washington v. Haven Mary ScabbyrobeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. Personal Restraint Petition of John Edward Mines, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API