Certified Fire Protection, Inc. v. Precision Construction, Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Pickering, J.:
To recover in quantum meruit, a party must establish legal liability on either an implied-in-fact contract or unjust enrichment basis. Because we agree with the district court that appellant/cross-respondent Certified Fire Protection, Inc. did not provide sufficient *375evidence to establish either an implied-in-fact contract or unjust enrichment, we affirm. Additionally, we affirm on cross-appeal the district court’s order denying attorney fees.
I
Respondent/cross-appellant Precision Construction, Inc., a general contractor pursuing a contract for a warehouse…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lackner v. GlosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- May v. AndersonNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Beattie v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- AmeriPro Search, Inc. v. Fleming Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Martin v. CampanaroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Alhassid v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- NAUTILUS INS. CO. VS. ACCESS MED., LLC (NRAP 5)Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
- Grisham v. GrishamNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
- In re Distribution of Attorney's Fees Between Stowman Law Firm, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.