Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 20, 2007No. CA CR 06-1286PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Karen R. Baker, Judge.

Appellant Richard Bell, Jr., challenges his conviction for domestic battery in the first degree alleging that the trial court erred by misinterpreting the proof required for the culpable mental state and consequently in failing to grant his motion for directed verdict, and that the verdict is not supported by substantial evidence. We find no error and affirm.

At a bench trial, testimony established that appellant had been living with his girlfriend and her two sons at her residence for approximately seven to eight months. At the time of the incident, her younger child,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Britt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Tigue v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  3. United States v. Jason PylesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  5. Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API