Legal Opinion

O'NEAL v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 8, 2004No. CR 03-980PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Hannah, Justice.

Ronald Dee O’Neal appeals his conviction for capital murder and sentence of life without parole. O’Neal asserts that he should receive a new trial because the trial court erred in finding that the State presented sufficient evidence to support his conviction, erred in admitting speculative testimony regarding trauma to the victim’s genitals, and erred in admitting prejudicial photographs of the victim’s decomposed body. We hold there is no reversible error and affirm. Our jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2(a)(2) (2003).

Facts

By O’Neal’s own admission, he…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Barnes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Westbrook v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Carmichael v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Bailey v. Delta Trust & BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Thornton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API