Legal Opinion

Nemaha Valley Drainage District v. Marconnit

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1912No. 16,628PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Nemaha county: John B. Rader, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

In June, 1906, proceedings were begun in Nemaha county for the purpose of organizing a drainage district under the provisions of chapter 161, laws 1905, commonly known as the “Peabody Act,” which resulted in the creation of a drainage district corporation. An engineer was employed by the board of supervisors, who made a survey and prepared and filed maps and plans with a report ascertaining and apportioning the benefits to each tract of land within the district. The board of supervisors then notified the owners of property affected of the time and place when and where objections to the report…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Householder v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. O'NeillNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Keith v. BinghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  4. County of Dodge v. AcomNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Drainage District No. 1 v. Richardson CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Garrow v. GraysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Grimm v. Elkhorn Valley Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  3. City of Omaha v. MatthewsNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Drainage District v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Burt v. Farmers' Co-Operative Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API