Legal Opinion
City of Omaha v. Matthews
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1977No. 40678PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.
In this action plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendants from prosecuting an inverse condemnation action for alleged damages to their properties in the city of Omaha, Nebraska. Judgment was for defendants. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.
The defendants are the owners of two buildings on 19th Street between Farnam and Harney Streets in Omaha. The block directly to the east between 19th and 18th Streets was acquired by the Omaha-Douglas Public Building Commission created under Chapter 23, article 26, R. R. S. 1943. Defendants alleged that in building on the block acquired by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zirkle v. City of KingstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- Armbruster v. Stanton-Pilger Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- Patrick v. City of BellevueNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Nemaha Valley Drainage District v. MarconnitNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
- W. E. W. Truck Lines, Inc. v. State, Department of RoadsNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lambert v. HolmbergNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Parriott v. Drainage Dist. No. 6 of PeruNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Kula v. PrososkiNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Slusarski v. County of PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Beach v. City of FairburyNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.