Legal Opinion

State v. . Stathos

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1935PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheNCK, J.

The appellant makes several exceptive assignments of error, but under the view we take of the case it is necessary to consider only that assignment which imputes error to that portion of the charge as follows: “If tbe State has convinced you beyond a reasonable doubt from tbe evidence that at tbe time be bought tbe violin tbe circumstances, facts, and tbe knowledge of tbe defendant were such as to let him know or to cause an honest man who intended to be reasonably prudent in bis business transactions to inquire further before be received tbe violin, and be failed to do so and took the violin…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. FearingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  3. State v. . OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Underwood v. State Board of Alcoholic ControlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API