Legal Opinion

City of New Castle v. Uzamere

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 1, 2003PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

Pius Uzamere (Uzamere), representing himself, appeals the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lawrence County (trial court) denying his motion for post-trial relief and entering judgment in favor of the City of New Castle (City) in the amount of $3,995.00, the cost of abating a public nuisance. We affirm.

As reflected in the deed, Des-Maraf Company (the Company) is the owner of property at 436 Croton Avenue in the City. Uzamere signed the deed as agent of the Company. The deed does not describe the Company as a corporation, nor does it bear the signature of any person…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Yacoub v. Lehigh Valley Medical Associates, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. C & M Developers, Inc. v. Bedminster Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Simon v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schaaf v. KaufmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. PercudaniCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. City of Philadelphia v. PerfettiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Gehres v. Falls TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Logans' Reserve HOA v. J. McCabe and J. McCabeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API