Legal Opinion
C & M Developers, Inc. v. Bedminster Township Zoning Hearing Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 1, 2002No. 171 MAP 2001PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Justice NIGRO.
Appellant C & M Developers, Inc. appeals from the order of the Commonwealth Court affirming the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County’s order sustaining the amended Zoning Ordinance of Bedminster Township (“Township”) against Appellant’s challenges. We reverse.
On February 14, 1996, the Township Board of Supervisors (“Board”) enacted Resolution 96-02 pursuant to Section 609.2 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (“MPC”), 1 53 P.S. § 10609.2. 2 3 Resolution 96-02 declared the Township’s Zoning Ordinance invalid based on its failure “to provide for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Township of Exeter v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re Appeal of Realen Valley Forge Greenes AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Cimaszewski v. Bd. of Probation and ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Slice of Life, LLC v. Hamilton Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. SepulvedaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.