Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Walker

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 16, 1947No. 47142PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, J.

We'are without the benefit of the trial court’s views on the questions of fact and law presented because it made no written finding of facts and conclusions of law as required by Rule 179(a), Rules of Civil Procedure. Nor are its views otherwise shown.

Since 1941 defendants Raymond and Ruth Walker, husband and wife, have owned an eighty-acre farm, the north half of a certain quarter section in Mahaska county. Since March 1926 plaintiff, Roberts, has owned a farm of about three hundred fifty-eight acres, very irregular in shape, situated in three different sections, lying generally south and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grube v. WellsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Culver v. ConverseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. Thompson v. SchappertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Prymek v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  5. Hart v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nichols v. KirchnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  2. Webb v. ArterburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. Schwenker v. SagersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. Hadsall v. WestSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  5. Duke Carter v. Mike Fricke and Laura FrickeCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API