Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Kirchner

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1949No. 47552PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGtARKield, J.

— This is a dispute over the boundary line at the rear of plaintiff's vacant lot in Fort Dodge. Bach party claims ownership of a strip 14 by 62% feet, the width of the lot. We infer the area in question is near one end of the business district of the city.

In 1878 one Brockschink, then owner, made a deed to Oliver Nichols of property therein described substantially as: West % of Lot 2, Block 18, Morrison and Duncombe’s Addition to Fort Dodge, otherwise described as commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 2, thence south 140 feet, thence east 62% feet, thence north 140 feet, thence west…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Roth v. HeadleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Korf v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  3. Reichard v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  4. Hamilton v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  5. Litchfield v. SewellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fagen Elevator v. PfiesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. Stupka v. ScheidelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  3. Williams v. Stroh Plumbing & Electric, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Cole v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. Larimer v. PlatteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API