Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1960No. 6084PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENSON, District Judge.

This proceeding comes before us pursuant to 5 U.S.C.A. § 1031 et seq. on a petition to obtain judicial review of an order of the Judicial Officer in the United States Department of Agriculture, acting for the Secretary, by which petitioners were required to cease and desist from certain practices alleged by respondents to have been illegal under the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, 42 Stat. 159, 7 U.S.C.A. § 181 et seq.,1 *and which sus*310pended the petitioners for a period of twenty days as registrants under the act.

The Packers and Stockyards Act regulates, among…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Goodrich Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Moog Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Capitol Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  3. Fred S. Aikins v. United States and Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  4. Baugh v. Matheson (In Re Matheson)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 1981
  5. Mosley v. Tennessee Department of Commerce & InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API