Doggett Lumber Co. v. Conrades
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.
The trial judge found as a fact that the note secured by the deed of trust was past due and that there was no allegation that the trustee in said deed of trust was insolvent. The execution of the note and deed of trust was admitted and there is no allegation of fraud, restraint, oppression or usury in the transaction. The trial judge was therefore correct in refusing to restrain the sale of the land in accordance with the terms of the deed of trust and in accordance with the tenor of the note secured thereby. Ordinarily, an injunction will not be granted in eases of this kind where there is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Atlanta & Florida Railroad v. KimberlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Hayes v. PaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- McNamee v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Leak v. . ArmfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Hayes v. . PaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bolich v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- First National Bank v. PurvisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931