Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Purvis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 9, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

No facts admitted by the parties or found by the judge appear in the judgment continuing* the temporary restraining order to the final hearing. The action was heard and considered on the verified pleadings. It was thereupon ordered, considered and adjudged that the temporary restraining order issued on 26 May, 1931, be continued in full force until the final hearing.

It appears from the admissions in the pleadings that the deeds of trust containing the powers of sale under which the defendant, B. H. Hicks, trustee, had advertised the land described-in the complaint for sale, were executed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hayes v. PaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Leak v. . ArmfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Collins v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Hayes v. . PaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Doggett Lumber Co. v. ConradesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dennis v. RedmondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Dennis v. . RedmondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. First Carolinas Joint Stock Land Bank of Columbia v. PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Harrison v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API