Gould-National Batteries, Inc. v. Gulton Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Circuit Judge.
These appeals are from a judgment entered in an action for the infringement of two patents, No. 2,571,927 and No. 2,-636,058, each of which covers several variants of an electrolytic cell commonly used in sealed storage batteries of the secondary type. The court below held claims 1, 3 and 4 of ’927, and claims 2, 5, 6 and 9 of ’058, invalid. 231 F.Supp. 609. This holding will be affirmed. The only remaining question is whether the court erred in its determination that claim 2 of ’927 was valid and infringed. We find it necessary to consider only the issue of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Research Corporation v. Nasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Johnson & Johnson v. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Congoleum Industries, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Sperti Products, Inc. v. The Coca Cola Company, Sperti Products, Inc. And the Institutum Divi Thomae FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Trimble Products Inc. v. W. T. Grant Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.