Legal Opinion

Johnson & Johnson v. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 28, 1977No. Civ. A. 4334PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff, Johnson & Johnson (“J & J”) has brought an action against W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. (“Gore”), charging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 3,002,770 covering a “Threaded Joint with Lubricating and Sealing Ribbon Interposed Between the Threads”. In its answer, defendant denies infringement, and asserts three grounds of invalidity with respect to the patent in suit: lack of inventorship under § 102(f), obviousness under § 103, and anticipation under § 102. In addition, defendant urges that the failure of plaintiff to reveal certain prior art to…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Donald H. ThorpeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Biacore, AB v. Thermo Bioanalysis Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
  3. Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH v. Dart Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. Montedison, S.p.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. General Battery Corp. v. Gould, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API